Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 1996
Division of STD Prevention September 1997 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention Division of STD Prevention Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Copyright Information All material contained in this report is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission; citation to source, however, is appreciated. Suggested Citation Division of STD Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 1996. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, September 1997. Copies can be obtained from the Office of Communications, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-06, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. The reports for 1993 through 1996 are available electronically on CDC WONDER. For information about registering for CDC WONDER, please contact CDC's Epidemiology Program Office at (888) 496-8347. These reports are also available from the Internet via the CDC home page address http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/data/Reports.html. Chlamydia Infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis are among the most prevalent of all sexually transmitted diseases. In women these infections often result in pelvic inflammatory disease, which can cause infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain. Data from a randomized controlled trial of chlamydia screening in a managed care setting suggest that such screening programs can reduce the incidence of PID by as much as 60% (1). In addition, pregnant women infected with chlamydia can infect their babies during delivery. While case reporting of chlamydial infections is improving, it remains incomplete in many areas of the country. A combination of factors limit the documentation of the incidence and prevalence of genital chlamydial infection: variable compliance with public health laws and regulations that require health care providers and laboratories to report cases to local health authorities; large numbers of asymptomatic persons who can be identified only through screening; limited resources to support screening activities; and incompletely developed information management systems for collecting, maintaining, and analyzing case reporting and prevalence data. Thus, for most areas, the number of chlamydia cases reported to CDC by state health departments reflects many factors, only one of which is number of infections in the population. For defined populations of sexually active women, data on prevalence obtained through routine screening can provide a more accurate measure of the true burden of disease. -- In 1996, 49 states and the District of Columbia required reporting of chlamydia and reported cases to CDC. Only cases from New York City were reported for the state of New York (Figure_1, Table_5). -- In 1996, 490,080 chlamydial infections were reported to CDC from 49 states, District of Columbia and New York City (Table_1). Reported cases of chlamydia far exceed reported cases of gonorrhea (325,883 gonorrhea cases in 1996, Table_1). -- From 1987 through 1996 reported rates of chlamydia increased from 47.8 cases per 100,000 persons to 194.5 (Figure_2). This trend reflects increased screening, recognition of asymptomatic infection (mainly in women), and improved reporting, as well as the continuing high burden of disease. -- In 1996, the chlamydia case rate was highest in the South, reflecting a recent expansion of screening activity in this Region. Before 1996, reported chlamydia rates were highest in the West and Midwest, where substantial resources had been committed for screening programs (e.g., in family planning clinics) (Table_5, Figure_3 and Figure_4). -- Between 1995 and 1996, rates of chlamydia reported from selected large cities (>200,000 population) increased 2% from 313.2 cases per 100,000 persons to 318.6 (Figure_5, Table_9). -- Reported rates of chlamydia for women (321.5 per 100,000 persons) exceed those for men (60.4) (Figure_6, Table_6, Table_7, Table_10, and Table_11). This is mainly due to detection of asymptomatic infection in women through screening. The low rates in men suggest that many of the sex partners of women with chlamydia are not diagnosed or reported. In addition, men diagnosed as having non-gonococcal urethritis are treated but frequently not tested. A large proportion of these men are infected with chlamydia, but they are not detected by surveillance systems based on laboratory reporting of positive chlamydia tests. -- Rates of chlamydia for women are highest in the 15- to 19- year-olds (2,068.6 per 100,000) and in the 20- to 24-year-olds (1,485.2). For men, age-specific rates are also highest in these age groups (Figure_7, Table_3B). -- Chlamydia screening and prevalence-monitoring activities were initiated in Health and Human Services (HHS) Region X in 1988 as a CDC-supported demonstration project. In 1993, chlamydia screening services for women were initiated in three additional HHS regions (III, VII, and VIII) and, in 1995, in the remaining HHS regions (I, II, IV, V, VI, and IX). In some regions, federally-funded chlamydia screening supplements local- and state-funded screening programs. -- In 1996, state-specific chlamydia test positivity among 15- to 24-year- old women screened varied from 2.5% to 10.9% among those attending family planning clinics (Figure_9). These chlamydia test positivity rates are from those states reporting data on 1,000 or more women screened during 1996. -- The effectiveness of large-scale screening programs in reducing chlamydia prevalence in women has been well documented in areas where this intervention has been in place for several years. For example, the screening programs in Health and Human Services Region X (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington) family planning clinics have demonstrated a decline in chlamydia positivity of 61% since 1988 among 15- to 44-year- old women. Introduction of large-scale screening in HHS Region III and HHS Region VIII has also been followed by similar declines in chlamydia positivity (Figure_10). -- Additional information on chlamydia screening programs for women of reproductive age and chlamydia among adolescents and minority populations can be found in the Special Focus Profiles section. Figure_1. Chlamydia -- Number of states that require reporting of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: United States, 1987-1996 Figure_2. Chlamydia -- Reported rates: United States, 1984-1996 Figure_3. Chlamydia -- Rates by state: United States and outlying areas, 1996 Figure_4. Chlamydia -- Rates by region: United States, 1984-1996 Figure_5. Chlamydia -- Rates in selected U.S. cities of >200,000 population, 1984-1996 Figure_6. Chlamydia -- Rates by gender: United States, 1984-1996 Figure_7. Chlamydia -- Age- and gender-specific rates: United States, 1996 Figure_8. Chlamydia -- Percent positivity among women tested in family planning clinics by state: Region X, 1988-1996 Figure_9. Chlamydia -- Percent positivity among 15-24 year old women tested in selected family planning clinics by state, 1996 Figure_10. Chlamydia -- Percent positivity among 15-44 year old women tested in family planning clinics by HHS regions: 1996 ---------- (1) Scholes D, Stergachis A, Heidrich FE, Andrilla H, Holmes KK, Stamm WE. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med 1996;34(21):1362-66.
This page last reviewed: Monday, February 01, 2016
This information is provided as technical reference material. Please contact us at cwus@cdc.gov to request a simple text version of this document.