Warning:
This document is being maintained for historical purposes, but is now out of date. To view current guidelines please visit:
- STD Treatment Guidelines at http://www.cdc.gov/STD/treatment
1993 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines
09/24/1993 SUGGESTED CITATION Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR 1993;42(No. RR-14): {inclusive page numbers}. CIO Responsible for this publication: National Center for Prevention Services, Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV Prevention HIV INFECTION AND EARLY INTERVENTION Infection with HIV produces a spectrum that progresses from no apparent illness to AIDS as a late manifestation. The pace of disease progression is variable. The median time between infection with HIV and the development of AIDS among adults is 10 years, with a range from a few months to greater than or equal to 12 years. Most adults and adolescents infected with HIV remain symptom-free for long periods, but viral replication can be detected in asymptomatic persons and increases substantially as the immune system deteriorates. Most people who are infected with HIV will eventually have symptoms related to the infection. In cohort studies of adults infected with HIV, data indicated that symptoms developed in 70%-85% of infected adults, and AIDS developed in 55%- 62% within 12 years after infection. Additional cases are expected to occur among those who have remained AIDS-free for greater than 12 years. Greater awareness of risky behaviors by both patients and health-care providers has led to increased testing for HIV and earlier diagnosis of early HIV infection, often before symptoms develop (though emotional or psychological problems may occur). Such early identification of HIV infection is important for several reasons. Treatments are available to slow the decline of immune system function. Persons who are infected with HIV and altered immune function also are at increased risk for infections such as tuberculosis (TB), bacterial pneumonia, and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), for which preventive measures are available. Because of its effect on the immune system, HIV affects the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of many other diseases and may affect the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for some STDs. Close clinical follow-up after treatment for STDs is imperative. During early infection, persons with HIV and their families can be educated about the disease and become linked with a support network that addresses their needs and with care systems effective in maintaining good health and delaying the onset of symptoms. Early diagnosis also offers the opportunity for counseling and for assistance in preventing the transmission of HIV infection to others. For the purpose of these recommendations, early intervention for HIV is defined as care for persons infected with HIV who are without symptoms. However, recently detected HIV infection may not have been recently acquired. Persons newly diagnosed with HIV may be at many different stages of the infection. Therefore, early intervention also involves assuming the responsibility for coordinating care and for arranging access to resources necessary to meet the medical, psychological, and social needs of persons with more advanced HIV infection. Diagnostic Testing for HIV-1 and HIV-2 HIV infection is most often diagnosed by using HIV-1 antibody tests. Antibody testing begins with a sensitive screening test such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or a rapid assay. If confirmed by Western blot or other supplemental test, a positive antibody test means that a person is infected with HIV and is capable of transmitting the virus to others. HIV antibody is detectable in greater than or equal to 95% of patients within 6 months of infection. Although a negative antibody test usually means a person is not infected, antibody tests cannot rule out infection that occurred less than 6 months before the test. Since there is transplacental passage of maternal HIV antibody, antibody tests for HIV are expected to be positive in the serum of both infected and uninfected infants born to a seropositive mother. Passively acquired HIV antibody falls to undetectable levels among most infants by 15 months of age. A definitive determination of HIV infection for an infant less than 15 months of age should be based either on the presence of antibody to HIV in conjunction with a compatible immunologic profile and clinical course or on laboratory evidence of HIV in blood or tissues by culture, nucleic acid, or antigen detection. Specific recommendations for the diagnostic testing of HIV are listed below: -- Informed consent must be obtained before an HIV test is performed. Some states require written consent. See HIV Prevention Counseling for a discussion of pretest and posttest counseling. -- Positive screening tests for HIV antibody must be confirmed by a more specific confirmatory test (either the Western blot assay or indirect immunofluorescence assay {IFA}) before being considered definitive for confirming HIV infection. -- Persons with positive HIV tests must receive medical and psychosocial evaluation and monitoring services, or be referred for these services. The prevalence of HIV-2 in the United States is extremely low, and CDC does not recommend routine testing for HIV-2 in settings other than blood centers, unless demographic or behavioral information suggests that HIV-2 infection might be present. Those at risk for HIV-2 infection include persons from a country in which HIV-2 is endemic or the sex partners of such persons. (As of July 1992, HIV-2 was endemic in parts of West Africa and an increased prevalence of HIV-2 had been reported in Angola, France, Mozambique, and Portugal.) Additionally, testing for HIV-2 should be conducted when there is clinical evidence or suspicion of HIV disease in the absence of a positive test for antibodies to HIV-1 (6). Counseling for Patients with HIV Infection Behavioral and psychosocial services are an integral part of HIV early intervention. Patients usually experience emotional distress when first being informed of a positive HIV test result, and also later when notified of changes in immunologic markers, when antiviral or prophylactic therapy is initiated, and when symptoms develop. Patients face several major adaptive challenges: a) accepting the possibility of a curtailed life span, b) coping with others' reactions to a stigmatizing illness, c) developing strategies for maintaining physical and emotional health, and d) initiating changes in behavior to prevent HIV transmission. Many patients also require assistance with making reproductive choices, gaining access to health services and health insurance, and confronting employment discrimination. Interrupting HIV transmission depends upon changes in behavior by those persons at risk for transmitting or acquiring infection. Though some viral culture studies suggest that antiviral treatment reduces viral burden, clinical data are insufficient to determine whether therapy might reduce the probability of transmission. Infected persons, as potential sources of new infections, must receive extra attention and support to help break chains of transmission and to prevent infection of others. Targeting behavior change programs toward HIV-infected persons and their sex partners, or those with whom they share needles, is an important adjunct to current AIDS prevention efforts. Specific recommendations for counseling patients with HIV infection are listed below: -- Persons who test positive for HIV antibody should be counseled by a person who is able to discuss the medical, psychological, and social implications of HIV infection. -- Appropriate social support and psychological resources should be available, either on site or through referral, to assist patients in coping with emotional distress. -- Persons who continue to be at risk for transmitting HIV should receive assistance in changing or avoiding behaviors that can transmit infection to others. Initial Evaluation and Planning for Care Practice settings for offering early HIV care are variable, depending upon local resources and needs. Primary-care providers and outpatient facilities must ensure that appropriate resources are available for each patient and must avoid fragmentation of care; it is preferable for persons with HIV infection to receive care from a single source that is able to provide comprehensive care for all stages of HIV infection. But the limited availability of such resources often results in the need to coordinate care among outpatient, inpatient, and specialist providers in different locations. Because of the progressive nature of HIV and the increased risk for bacterial infections, including TB -- even before HIV infection becomes advanced -- it is essential to establish specific provisions for handling the medical, psychological, and social problems likely to arise at any stage of infection. An important component of early intervention is effective linkage with referral settings where off-hours care and specialty services are available. Development of an appropriate plan for care involves the following: -- Identification of patients in need of immediate medical care (e.g., patients with symptomatic HIV infection or emotional crisis) and of those in need of antiretroviral therapy or prophylaxis for opportunistic infections (e.g., PCP). -- Evaluation for the presence of diseases associated with HIV, such as TB and STDs. -- Administration of recommended vaccinations. -- Case management or referral for case management. -- Counseling (see Counseling for Patients with HIV Infection). The CD4+ T-lymphocyte count is the best laboratory indicator of clinical progression, and comprehensive management strategies for HIV infection are typically stratified by CD4 count. Either the absolute number or the percentage of CD4+ T cells may be determined. CD4+ percentage is more consistent than absolute CD4+ count with successive measurements for the same person and less variable with delays in specimen processing. However, most clinical trials have used absolute CD4+ count to evaluate the need for and timing of therapeutic interventions. Patients with CD4+ counts greater than 500/uL usually do not demonstrate evidence of clinical immunosuppression. Patients with 200-500 CD4+ cells/uL are more likely to develop HIV-related symptoms and to require medical intervention. Patients with CD4+ counts less than 200 cells/uL, and those with higher CD4+ counts who develop thrush or unexplained fever (temperature greater than 37.8 C for greater than or equal to 2 weeks) are at increased risk for developing complicated HIV disease. Such patients should be managed in a comprehensive treatment setting with access to specialty resources and hospitalization. Providers unable to offer therapeutic management of HIV may use the initial evaluation to identify the need for prompt referral to appropriate resources. The initial evaluation of HIV-positive patients should include the following essential components: -- A detailed history, including sexual history, substance abuse history, and a review of systems for specific HIV-related symptoms. -- A physical examination; for females, this examination should include a gynecologic examination. -- For females, testing for N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, and wet mount examination of vaginal secretions. -- A syphilis serology. -- A CD4+ T-lymphocyte analysis. -- Complete blood and platelet counts. -- A purified protein derivative (PPD) tuberculin skin test by the Mantoux method and anergy testing with two delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) antigens (Candida, mumps, or tetanus toxoid) administered by the Mantoux method or a multipuncture device. -- A thorough psychosocial evaluation, including ascertainment of behavioral factors indicating risk for transmitting HIV and elucidation of information about any partners who should be notified about possible exposure to HIV. Preventive Therapy for TB Studies conducted among persons with and without HIV infection have suggested that HIV infection can depress tuberculin reactions before signs and symptoms of HIV infection develop. Cutaneous anergy (defined as skin test response of less than or equal to 3 mm to all DTH antigens) may be present among greater than or equal to 10% of asymptomatic persons with CD4+ counts greater than 500 cells/uL, and among greater than 60% of persons with CD4+ counts less than 200. HIV-positive persons with a PPD reaction greater than or equal to 5 mm induration are considered to be infected with M. tuberculosis and should be evaluated for preventive treatment with isoniazid after active TB has been excluded. Anergic persons whose risk for tuberculous infection is estimated to be greater than or equal to 10%, based on available prevalence data, also should be considered for preventive therapy. For further details regarding evaluation of patients for TB, refer to Purified Protein Derivative (PPD-tuberculin anergy) and HIV Infection: Guidelines for Anergy Testing and Management of Anergic Persons at Risk of Tuberculosis (7). The preliminary results from a randomized clinical trial suggest that treatment with isoniazid is effective for preventing active TB among HIV-infected persons. The usual regimen is isoniazid 10 mg/kg daily, up to a maximum adult dose of 300 mg daily. Twelve months of isoniazid preventive treatment is recommended for persons with HIV infection. For further details regarding preventive therapy for TB, refer to The Use of Preventive Therapy for Tuberculous Infection in the United States (8) and Management of Persons Exposed to Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (9). Recommended Immunizations for Adults and Adolescents Specific recommendations for immunization of persons infected with HIV are listed below: -- Pneumococcal vaccination and an annual influenza vaccination should be administered. -- Persons at increased risk for acquiring HBV and who lack evidence of immunity may receive a three-dose schedule of hepatitis B vaccine, with postvaccination serologic testing between 1 and 6 months after the vaccination series. Recommendations for vaccinating HIV-infected persons are based on expert opinions and consensus of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). No clinical data exist to document the efficacy of inactivated vaccines among HIV-infected persons, and pneumococcal vaccine failures have been reported. However, the use of inactivated vaccines may be beneficial for persons with HIV infection and there is no evidence that they are harmful. Immunogenicity studies have suggested a generally poorer response among HIV-infected persons, with higher response rates among asymptomatic persons than among those with advanced HIV disease. Current evidence indicates that HIV infection does not increase susceptibility to HBV, nor does it increase the severity of clinical disease. The presence of HIV infection is not an indication for hepatitis B vaccine, but HIV-infected persons are at increased risk for becoming chronic carriers after hepatitis B infection. Because the routes of transmission of HBV parallel those of HIV, efforts to modify risky behaviors must be the primary focus of prevention efforts. However, vaccine should be administered to HIV-infected patients who continue to have a high likelihood for HBV exposure. Persons with HIV infection also are at increased risk for invasive Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) disease and for complications from measles. Immunization against Hib and measles should be considered for asymptomatic HIV-infected persons who may have an increased risk for exposure to these infections. For further details on immunization of HIV-infected patients, refer to Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP): Use of Vaccines and Immune Globulins in Persons with Altered Immunocompetence (10). Follow-Up Evaluation There have been no controlled studies to serve as the basis for recommending specific follow-up tests or follow-up intervals. The suggested frequency of monitoring is based on the slow decrease in CD4+ counts observed among patients in cohort studies, but should be modified depending on the patient's psychological status, the presence of symptoms, or both. Repeat evaluation for STDs also is important in the follow-up of HIV-infected persons and should be performed on all persons who continue to be sexually active. Follow-up evaluation should be performed every 6 months and should include the following: -- An interim history and physical examination; -- A complete blood count, platelet count, and lymphocyte subset analysis; -- Re-evaluation of psychosocial status and behavioral factors indicating risk for transmitting HIV. To follow CD4+ measurements, providers should use the same laboratory and, optimally, obtain each specimen at the same time each day. When unexpected or discrepant results are obtained or when major treatment decisions are to be made, health-care providers should consider repeating the CD4+ measurement after at least 1 week. More frequent laboratory monitoring, every 3-4 months, is indicated if CD4+ results indicate a patient is close to a point when a clinical intervention may be indicated. Continuing Management of Patients with Early HIV Infection Providing comprehensive, continuing management of patients with early HIV infection can include additional diagnostic studies (e.g., chest x-ray, serum chemistry, antibody testing for toxoplasmosis and hepatitis B), antiretroviral therapy and monitoring, and PCP prophylaxis. Treatment of HIV infection and prophylaxis against opportunistic infections continue to evolve rapidly. This treatment should be undertaken in consultation with physicians who are familiar with the care of persons with HIV infection. The complete therapeutic management of HIV infection is beyond the scope of this document. Antiretroviral Therapy The optimal time for initiating antiretroviral therapy has not yet been established. Zidovudine (ZDV) at a dose of 500 mg/day (100 mg orally every 4 hours while the patient is awake) has been recommended for symptomatic persons with less than 500 CD4+ T-cells/uL, and for asymptomatic persons with less than 300 CD4+ T-cells/uL. This recommendation is based on results of short-term follow-up in three randomized clinical trials demonstrating that the initiation of ZDV therapy delays progression to advanced disease. Evidence for improved long-term survival after early treatment is less conclusive. The effects of ZDV may be transient, possibly because of the development of viral resistance or other factors. Sequential or combination therapy with other antiretroviral agents could be more efficacious. Whether other daily dosages, dose schedules, or dosages based on body weight would result in greater therapeutic benefit or few side effects is not known. Providers should work with patients to design a treatment strategy that is both clinically sound and appropriate for each individual patient's needs, priorities, and circumstances. An initial dose of 600 mg in divided doses has been recommended by a panel of experts convened by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Preliminary data suggest ZDV can yield therapeutic results when the dosing interval is increased to 8 hours, and at doses of 200 mg three times daily. Antiretroviral efficacy is diminished at doses less than 300 mg/day, and it has been suggested that higher oral doses may be required to achieve effective levels in the central nervous system. There are no data to support the use of antiretroviral drugs other than ZDV as initial therapy. Didanosine (DDI) is recommended for persons who are intolerant of ZDV or who experience progression of symptoms despite ZDV. Two 100 mg tablets of DDI are recommended every 12 hours for persons who weigh greater than or equal to 60 kg; the recommended dose for adults less than 60 kg is one 100 mg tablet and one 25 mg tablet every 12 hours. Two tablets are recommended at each dose so that adequate buffering is provided to prevent gastric acid degradation of the drug. Benefits have been reported from other antiretroviral regimens, including treatment with combinations of ZDV, DDC (dideoxycytidine {zalcitabine}), and DDI, or switching therapy to DDI after long-term therapy with ZDV. Experience with these alternatives is insufficient to serve as a basis for recommendations. Providers managing patients who are taking antiretroviral therapy should be familiar with evidence being developed in several clinical trials. Current information is available from the NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Information Service, 1-800-TRIALS-A. Side effects that are serious (e.g., anemia, cytopenia, pancreatitis, and peripheral neuropathy) and uncomfortable (e.g., nausea, vomiting, headaches, and insomnia) are common during antiretroviral therapy. Although hematologic toxicity from ZDV is less common with the lower doses recommended, approximately 2% of patients who receive 500 mg/day manifest severe anemia by the 18th month of treatment -- most within the 3rd through 8th month of treatment. Careful hematologic monitoring of patients receiving ZDV is recommended. PCP Prophylaxis Adults and adolescents with less than 200 CD4+ T-cells/uL or with constitutional symptoms, such as thrush or unexplained fever greater than 100 F for greater than or equal to 2 weeks, and any patient with a previous episode of PCP should receive PCP prophylaxis. Prophylaxis should be continued for the lifetime of the patient. Based upon evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials, the Public Health Service Task Force on Antipneumocystis Prophylaxis has recommended the following regimens for PCP prophylaxis among adults and adolescents: -- Oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) at a dose of one double-strength tablet (800 mg SMX and 160 mg TMP) orally once a day. -- For patients unable to tolerate TMP-SMX: aerosol pentamidine administered by either the Respirgard II nebulizer regimen (300 mg once a month) or the Fisoneb nebulizer (initial loading regimen of five 60 mg doses during a 2-week period, followed by a 60 mg dose every 2 weeks). The efficacy of alternatives for patients unable to tolerate TMP-SMX, including dapsone 100 mg orally once a day and sulfa desensitization, has not been studied extensively. For further details on PCP prophylaxis, refer to Recommendations for Prophylaxis Against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia for adults and adolescents infected with human immunodeficiency virus (11). Management of Sex Partners The rationale for implementing partner notification is that early diagnosis and treatment of HIV infection may reduce morbidity and offers the opportunity to encourage risk-reducing behaviors. Two complementary notification processes, patient referral and provider referral, can be used to identify partners. With patient referral, patients inform their own partners directly of their exposure to HIV infection. With provider referral, trained health department personnel locate partners on the basis of the names, descriptions, and addresses provided by the patient. During the notification process, the anonymity of patients is protected; their names are not revealed to sex or needle-sharing partners who are notified. Many state health departments provide assistance with provider referral partner notification upon request. One randomized trial suggested that provider referral is more effective in notifying partners than patient referral. In that trial, 50% of partners in the provider referral group were notified, yet only 7% of partners were notified by subjects in the patient referral group. However, few data demonstrate whether behavioral change takes place as a result of partner notification and many patients are reluctant to disclose the names of partners because of concern about discrimination, disruption of relationships, and loss of confidentiality for the partners. When referring to those persons infected with HIV, the term "partner" includes not only sex partners but also injecting drug users who share needles or other injecting equipment. Partner notification is a means of identifying and concentrating risk- reduction efforts on persons at high risk for contracting or transmitting HIV infection. Partner notification for HIV infection must be confidential and should depend upon the voluntary cooperation of the patient. Specific recommendations for implementing partner notification procedures are listed below: -- Persons who are HIV-positive should be encouraged to notify their partners and to refer them for counseling and testing. Providers should assist in this process, if desired by the patient, either directly or through referral to health department partner notification programs. -- If patients are unwilling to notify their partners or if it cannot be assured that their partners will seek counseling, physicians or health department personnel should use confidential procedures to assure that the partners are notified. Special Considerations Pregnancy Women who are HIV-infected should be specifically informed about the risk for perinatal infection. Current evidence indicates that 15%-39% of infants born to HIV- infected mothers are infected with HIV, and the virus also can be transmitted from an infected mother by breastfeeding. Pregnancy among HIV-infected patients does not appear to increase maternal morbidity or mortality. Women should be counseled about their options regarding pregnancy. The objective of counseling is to provide HIV-infected women with current information for making reproductive decisions, analogous to the model used in genetic counseling. Contraceptive, prenatal, and abortion services should be available on site or by referral. Minimal information is available on the use of ZDV or other antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy. Trials to evaluate its efficacy in preventing perinatal transmission and its safety during pregnancy are being conducted. A case series of 43 pregnant women has been published; dosages of ZDV ranged from 300 to 1,200 mg/day. ZDV was well tolerated and there were no malformations among the newborns in this series. Although this observation is encouraging, this series of negative case reports cannot be used to infer that ZDV is not teratogenic. Burroughs Wellcome Co. and Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., in cooperation with CDC, maintain a registry to assess the effects of the use of ZDV and DDC during pregnancy. Women who receive either ZDV or DDC during pregnancy should be reported to this registry (1-800-722-9292, ext. 58465). HIV Infection Among Infants and Children Infants and young children with HIV infection differ from adults and adolescents with respect to the diagnosis, clinical presentation, and management of HIV disease. For example, total lymphocytes and absolute CD4+ cell counts are much higher in infants and children than in healthy adults and are age dependent. Specific indications and dosages for both antiretroviral and prophylactic therapy have been developed for children (12). Other modifications must be made in health services that are recommended for infants and children, such as avoiding vaccination with live oral polio vaccine when a child (or close household contact) is infected with HIV. State laws differ regarding consent of minor persons ( less than 18 years of age) for HIV counseling and testing, evaluation, treatment services, and participation in clinical trials. Although most adolescents receive adult doses of antiretroviral and prophylactic therapy, there are no data on modification of these dosages during puberty. Management of infants, children, and adolescents -- who are known or suspected to be infected with HIV -- requires referral to, or close consultation with, physicians familiar with the manifestations and treatment of pediatric HIV infection.
This page last reviewed: Monday, February 01, 2016
This information is provided as technical reference material. Please contact us at cwus@cdc.gov to request a simple text version of this document.